Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

545 So. 2d 931

545 So.2d 931

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1236

State v. Byers

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-05-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1989

1 state decisions

Relies on 463 So. 2d 525 - State v. Williams · State v. Ealy · 541 So. 2d 1208 - Watts v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-05-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

¶2In these eight appeals, which the court has consolidated on its own motion, the state challenges the trial court’s downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. Because the notices of appeal were filed more than fifteen days after the judgments and sentences were rendered, we dismiss the appeals as untimely filed. See State v. Hieber, 541 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); State v. Ealy, 533 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). As in Hieberand Ealy, we acknowl*932edge that our decision is in conflict with State v. Williams, 463 So.2d 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/545/so2d/931 · .json · Public domain