Madison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2014
2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Griffith v. Kentucky · Alimeg, Inc. v. Shlim · Ex Parte Branch · 522 So. 2d 18 - State v. Slappy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"We, therefore, find that the trial court's determination that the [prosecutor's] explanations were sufficient to overcome the presumption of discrimination and that his explanations were 'race-neutral' fails to meet the requirements of Batson v. Kentucky and Ex parte Branch , as herein cited. The determinations of the trial court are clearly erroneous."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a lack of proper examination of such jurors [and] leaves this court no alternative but to reverse and remand this cause for a new trial because of the explanations given by the district attorney”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“hostility to the police in this community,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.