Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 545 S.W.2d 477 - Valore v. State

Valore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 1997 · most notably McDuff v. State (1997), Esquivel v. State (1980)

40 state decisions

250197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Self v. State · Heredia v. State · Henriksen v. State · Sloan v. State · Fentis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Causing death ‘under the immediate influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause’ is in the nature of a defense to murder that reduces the offense to the lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter, and the State need not prove such influence beyond a reasonable doubt to establish voluntary manslaughter, but that if raised by the evidence it must prove the absence of such influence beyond a reasonable doubt to establish murder.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Proof of the corpus delicti may not be made by an extrajudicial confession alone, but proof of the corpus delicti need not be made independent of an extrajudicial confession. If there is some evidence corroborating the confession, the confession may be used to aid in the establishment of the corpus delicti.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. In doing so, the verdict will be sustained if there is any evidence which, if believed, shows the guilt of the accused.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.