Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

545 S.W.2d 673

State v. Bohlen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1976

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1976-12-07

Relies on State v. Simmons · State v. Graham · State v. Odzark

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-12-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2004

4 state decisions

201976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DOWD, Judge.

¶1The defendant was indicted for common assault. § 559.220 RSMo 1969. The defendant waived a trial by jury. Defendant was tried by a judge of the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, found guilty, and was sentenced to six months in the City Workhouse.

¶2The assault took place in a schoolyard on May 24, 1974. Defendant struck the victim, Mr. Willie Cole, with his fist and threw bricks at him. One school child also hit the victim with a brick.

¶3The victim was knocked unconscious and sustained injuries to the back of his head and his ear. His lip required several stitches, and he suffered a broken leg. Eighteen months after the assault the victim was still on crutches.

¶4Defendant did not deny the assault at trial but claimed it was in self defense. His sole point on appeal is that the verdict was “against the weight of evidence as a matter of law.”

¶5In a jury waived criminal case the findings of the court have the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. State v. Odzark, 532 S.W.2d 45, 49[6] (Mo.App.1976). Therefore, the appellate court does not weigh the evidence. State v. Simmons, 494 S.W.2d 302, 303[2] (Mo.1973); State v. Graham, 527 S.W.2d 936, 947[16] (Mo.App.1975). The weighing of the evidence is a matter for the trial judge who hears the witnesses and is in a position to judge their credibility. State v. Minor, 531 S.W.2d 101, 102[1] (Mo.App.1975). The point is without merit.

¶6The judgment is affirmed.

WEIER, P. J., and CLEMENS, J., concur.
/545/sw2d/673 · .json · Public domain