Davis v. H. Molsen & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 1 Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the execution of the 1965 royalty deed, Bill Y. Friend thought he was conveying only ½ of his royalty interest under the north ½ of the H.J. Friend Ranch? ANSWER, “WE DO,” OR “WE DO NOT.” ANSWER: 10 2 SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 2 Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the execution of the 1965 royalty deed, Alleane McMullan and/or D.K. McMullan thought they were purchasing only ½ of Bill Y. Friend’s royalty interest under the north ½ of the H.J. Friend Ranch? ANSWER, “WE DO,” OR “WE DO NOT.” ANSWER: 10 2 SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 3 Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that if the 1965 royalty deed conveyed any more interest than the parties thought, the inclusion of such interest was the result of mutual mistake? ANSWER, “YES,” OR “NO.” ANSWER: 11 1 ******: SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 7 Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Bill Y. Friend included a royalty interest other than ½ of his ¼ interest in the north ½ of the H.J. Friend Ranch in the 1965 royalty deed? ANSWER, “YES,” OR “NO.” ANSWER: 2 10”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. McMullan v. Friend