Mid-Con Freight Systems, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Commission’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Michigan Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 13901 · 49 U.S.C. § 13908 · 49 U.S.C. § 14504 · 49 U.S.C. § 302
Relies on Lamie v. United States Trustee · Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Geier v. American Honda Motor Co. · Chisom v. Roemer · Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“refer[ring] to something totally different”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.