Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 A2D 444 - State v. Libby

State v. Libby’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Matlock · Oregon v. Bradshaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Admissibility. Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habit or routine practice. (b) Method of Proof. Habit or routine practice may be proved by specific instances of conduct sufficient in number to warrant a finding that the habit existed or that the practice was routine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “First, independent of any post-crime admissions or confessions made by defendant, the State must have proved the corpus delicti to a probable cause standard, i.e., the State must have proved the basis for a substantial belief therein. Then the State must also have established the corpus delicti beyond a reasonable doubt considering the entire evidence, including any post-crime admissions or confessions made by defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “first, ... present evidence independent of the defendant’s own statements adequate to prove both elements of corpus delicti to a probable cause standard and, second, ... present evidence, including any post-crime admissions or confessions made by the defendant adequate to establish the corpus delicti beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.