In re King’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 326 · 11 U.S.C. § 327 · 11 U.S.C. § 328 · 11 U.S.C. § 330 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1408
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Turner v. Rogers · Stern v. Marshall · Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. Winn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Possess integrity and good moral character. (2) Be physically and mentally able to satisfactorily perform a trustee’s duties. (3) Be courteous and accessible to all parties with reasonable inquiries or comments about a case for which such individual is serving as private trustee. (4) Be free of prejudices against any individual, entity, or group of individuals or entities which would interfere with unbiased performance of a trustee's duties. (5) Not be related by affinity or consanguinity within the degree of first cousin to any employee of the Executive Office for United States Trustees of the Department of Justice, or to any employee of the office of the U.S. Trustee for the district in which he or she is applying. (6)(i) Be a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a state or of the District of Columbia; or (ii) Be a certified public accountant; ... (7) Be willing to provide reports as required by the U.S. Trustee. (8) Have submitted an application under oath, in the form prescribed by the Director, to the U.S. Trustee for the District in which appointment is sought: Provided, That this provision may be waived by the U.S. Trustee on approval of the Director.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Peterson“[T]he duties for which the attorney may be compensated are far more constricted in this [Chapter 7] setting than that posited by the applicant here: that when a lay person employs an attorney to, say, recover an asset, all that accompanies that effort, including the time in investigating, letter writing, phone calling and the hiring of other professionals, such as appraisers or real estate brokers, is compensable to the attorney. Those activities surely fall within the ambit of § 704, the Code's defined duties of the trustee who obviously has the skill and expertise to perform them by virtue of being a member of the United States Trustee's panel of trustees. The trustee is simply and obviously not a lay person unschooled in the art and science of finding, capturing and obtaining the value of an asset, for example.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Yovtcheva“necessarily has a greater skill set than a layman in performing duties such as investigating a debtor's financial affairs or writing letters to collect debts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Yovtcheva
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.