Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 F.2d 302 - United States v. Rodriguez

United States v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis

546 F.2d 302 · 1976

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
June 1999
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably United States v. Briscoe (1990), United States v. Whitten (1983)

41 federal appellate · 3 district ·

220197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Iannelli v. United States · Patterson v. United States · Barnes v. United States · Hill v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 25

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal from a criminal conviction, this court must construe the evidence direct and circumstantial in a manner consistent with the jury's verdict, resolving all conflicts in the evidence in favor of the prosecution. . . . We cannot weigh conflicting evidence, nor consider the credibility of witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] conspiracy can be furthered by overt acts, some of which may or may not be criminal in nature. If the former, an individual may be charged with both his participation in the separate criminal act which furthers the conspiracy, and for his participation in the conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.