Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 F.2d 43 - United States v. Savell

United States v. Savell’s Empirical Analysis

546 F.2d 43 · 1977

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
March 2009
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2009

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1101977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2111

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Logan v. United States · United States v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not reach a situation ... where the statements were unsolicited, spontaneous and freely made prior to any attempted interrogation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.