Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 F.3d 822 - Laskowski v. Spellings

Laskowski v. Spellings’s Empirical Analysis

546 F.3d 822 · 2008

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mootness is 'the doctrine of standing set in a time frame: The requisite personal interest that must exist at the commencement of the litigation (standing) must continue throughout its existence (mootness).'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.