Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

546 F. App'x 299

Smith v. Atkinson

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2013

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2013-11-22

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2014

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-11-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Harold Lee Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Smith’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Atkinson, No. 9:13-cv-00384-RMG, 2013 WL 3833050 (D.S.C. July 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/546/fappx/299 · .json · Public domain