Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 NE2D 106 - Hopper v. State

Hopper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2018

6 state decisions

401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Meachum v. Fano · Wells v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because a defendant may suffer the loss of his [or her] liberty by having judgment entered and by being subsequently sentenced upon termination of treatment .... we hold that an individual placed under drug treatment supervision has a protected liberty interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.