Baskin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1995
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Alfaro v. State · Huffman v. State · Lovell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record in this case discloses that appellant was given the usual Miranda warnings upon his arrest. His incriminating statement followed such warning; thus the State fully discharged its duty of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the statement was given freely and voluntarily as required under Richardson v. State, (1985), Ind., 476 N.E.2d 497 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baskin v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.