Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 P2D 995 - Apperson v. Kay

Apperson v. Kay’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2005

16 state decisions

1101976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dyer v. MacDougall · Robin Construction Co. v. United States · Liberty Leasing Co. v. Hillsum Sales Corp. · Sandra J. Douglas, for Herself and as Representative of a Class v. Beneficial Finance Co. Of Anchorage · Schneider v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The judgment sought [by a motion for summary judgment] shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.