Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 Pa. 616 - Commonwealth v. Collins

Commonwealth v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably Commonwealth v. Carson (2006), Jacobs v. Horn (2005)

3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

130199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Durst · Commonwealth v. Cabeza · Commonwealth v. Prosdocimo · Commonwealth v. Woodward · Commonwealth v. Buehl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court has broad discretion in phrasing its instructions, and may choose its own wording so long as the law is clearly, adequately, and accurately presented to the jury for its consideration. * * * We will not rigidly inspect a jury charge, finding reversible error for every technical inaccuracy, but rather evaluate whether the charge sufficiently and accurately apprises a lay jury of the law it must consider in rendering its decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.