Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

546 So. 2d 1145

Docket No. 88-2093.

Jackson v. Powell

Wanda JACKSON and Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Appellants, v. Reginald Jerome POWELL, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-07-25

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2011

6 state decisions

Relies on Koken v. Neubauer · Wilson v. County National Bank of South Florida · 471 So. 2d 680 - Long v. Bogaert

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Melvin A. Rubin, for appellants.

¶2Reginald Jerome Powell, in pro. per.

¶3Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We reverse the order modifying a child support obligation because there was no pleading or motion filed requesting such modification which would have afforded the appellant adequate and proper notice of *1146 the requested relief. E.g., Pace v. Pace,471 So.2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Sweetland v. Gauntlett,460 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Valdes v. Valdes,460 So.2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The trial court may not circumvent such required pleadings by ordering a child support modification on its own motion, see Koken v. Neubauer,374 So.2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), unless proper notice is given so that the opposing party has a fair opportunity to oppose the motion.

¶6Reversed.

/546/so2d/1145 · .json · Public domain