Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

546 So. 2d 1146

546 So.2d 1146

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1760

Bloom v. Bloom

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-07-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1992

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-07-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The wife brings a non-final appeal of an order granting temporary support, claiming that the trial court erred in considering a separation agreement entered into by the parties, and also that the amount of the award was so low as to be an abuse of discretion.

¶2We find no error with respect to consideration of the separation agreement under the circumstances of this case. With respect to the amount of undifferentiated family support the husband testified that he agreed to pay his child’s private schooling, summer camp, and all medical and dental expenses, in addition to the monthly award which agreement is not reflected in the order granting the support. Without those amounts included, the husband’s support for his child, considering his resources, would be an abuse of discretion. We therefore remand for inclusion of these as part of the temporary support obligation.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.
/546/so2d/1146 · .json · Public domain