Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

546 So. 2d 1192

546 So.2d 1192

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1858

Yanke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-08-04

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1990

4 state decisions

Relies on 547 So. 2d 1201 - Rhodes v. State · 540 So. 2d 848 - Yanke v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-08-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We find no merit in defendant’s contentions on appeal except for his contention that his sentencing guidelines score was erroneously calculated. We agree with that contention. See Yanke v. State, 540 So.2d 848 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 547 So.2d 1212 (1989).

¶2Defendant’s convictions are affirmed, the sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded for resentencing.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.
/546/so2d/1192 · .json · Public domain