Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

546 So. 2d 123

Docket No. 88-2684.

Collins v. State

Randy COLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-07-13

Relies on 444 So. 2d 947 - Jenkins v. State · 519 So. 2d 618 - Mays v. State · 453 So. 2d 143 - Timmons v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-07-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2010

10 state decisions

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Michael E. Allen, Public Defender; and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

¶3ERVIN, Judge.

¶4We reverse and remand that portion of appellant's sentences which impose costs upon appellant, because costs were imposed without adequate notice or opportunity to object to the assessment. Costs may, of course, be assessed on remand after adequate notice and opportunity have been afforded. Mays v. State,519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State,444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Raulerson v. State,544 So.2d 338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

¶5In addition, as it appears that several of the written sentences are inconsistent with the oral pronouncement of those sentences, we direct the trial court on remand to correct the written sentences to conform to the oral sentences. Ferguson v. State,545 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Timmons v. State,453 So.2d 143, 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

¶6REVERSED and REMANDED.

¶7SHIVERS, C.J. and JOANOS, J., concur.

/546/so2d/123 · .json · Public domain