Young v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · 388 So. 2d 737 - Jones v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ETC. · 466 So. 2d 811 - Holmes v. State Through Dept. of Highways · Brown v. Wolfe · 523 So. 2d 266 - Tracy v. Jefferson Parish
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For evidence to be relevant, it must have some probative value and be reasonably connected to the transaction in question. In assessing the relevancy of evidence, the trial court is granted a great deal of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.