Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

546 So. 2d 448

546 So.2d 448

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1666

Thurston v. Navarro

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-07-12

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-07-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2014

3 state decisions

101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus, quash the order under review, remand for further proceedings, and accordingly, order petitioner released forthwith.

¶2Prior to the trial court finding petitioner not guilty by reason of insanity, three court appointed doctors and two privately retained doctors each found petitioner did not meet the criteria for involuntary commitment under section 916.15, Florida Statutes (1987). After finding petitioner not guilty by reason of insanity, without any other expert testimony being presented, the trial court found petitioner met such criteria and ordered her committed to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services to be placed in a mental health treatment facility.

¶3The trial court improperly chose to reject the uncontradicted expert opinion testimony that petitioner did not meet the criteria for involuntary commitment.

¶4We do not foreclose the State from seeking whatever treatment of petitioner is permitted by law to insure her safety and the safety of others. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.217(b).

DELL, WALDEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
/546/so2d/448 · .json · Public domain