546 So. 2d 72 - Masonoff v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on LaBranche v. United States Olympic Committee · United States v. Benny · Harris v. State · 424 So. 2d 758 - Hicks v. State · McCullough v. Suter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f solo crimes by a self-employed person violated [the RICO Act] then the crime of racketeering, with its increased penalties, would apply to a substantial percentage of crimes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The relationship of a person with an enterprise requires a relationship involving two humans not a person and some type of property interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.