Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 SW2D 708 - Collida v. Collida

Collida v. Collida’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
7
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2012

19 state decisions

8019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grigsby v. Reib · Busby v. Busby · Fischer v. Fischer · Mahone v. Mahone · Courtney v. Courtney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I submit that the statutory provisions exempting funds in the retirement systems from forced seizure were designed to secure the pensioner and his family from improvidence and want. Such provisions were not designed to aid a member in excaping his lawful obligations to his wife and children. Such has been the holding in other states and may very well become the law in Texas in an appropriate case. See, e.g., Fischer v. Fischer, 13 N.J. 162 , 98 A.2d 568, 570 (1953); Courtney v. Courtney, 251 Wis. 443 , 29 N.W.2d 759, 762 (1947); and Mahone v. Mahone, 213 Kan. 346 , 517 P.2d 131, 133 (1973).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The prohibited acts under the statute are `anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, charge, garnishment, execution or levy.' Clearly, these prohibitions are intended `to protect the benefits and interest in the fund from the creditors and assignees of the member.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.