Haliburton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 1993 · most notably Rice v. State (1979), Short v. State (1989)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden · Smith v. State · Hogshooter v. State · Barylski v. State · Floyd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1) His motion must allege facts, as opposed to conclusions, warranting relief. Smith v. State, 513 S.W.2d 407 (Mo. banc 1974); Hogshooter v. State, 514 S.W.2d 109 (Mo.App.1974); Arnold v. State, 545 S.W.2d 683 (Mo.App.1976). “2) Those facts must raise matters not refuted by the files and records in the case. Rule 27.26(e); Smith v. State, supra; Hogshooter, supra; Arnold v. State, supra; Morris v. State, 547 S.W.2d 827 (Mo.App.1976). “3) The matters complained of must have resulted in prejudice to the defendant, Smith v. State, supra.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Peterson v. State · Grant v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.