Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 SW2D 810 - Stricklan v. Koella

Stricklan v. Koella’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2018

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

9019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hillhouse v. McDowell · 53 Tenn. App. 120 - Gay & Taylor, Inc. v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. · Olson v. North

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every counsel in practice knows that daily he is faced with the question whether in his client’s interest he should raise a new issue, put another witness in the box, or ask further questions of the witness whom he is examining or cross-examining. That is seldom an easy question but I think that most experienced counsel would agree that the golden rule is — when in doubt stop. Far more cases have been lost by going on too long than by stopping too soon. But the client does not know that. To him brevity may indicate incompetence or negligence and sometimes stopping too soon is an error of judgment. So I think it not at all improbable that the possibility of being sued for negligence would at least subconsciously lead some counsel to undue prolixity, which would not only be harmful to the client but against the public interest in prolonging trials. Many experienced lawyers already think that the lengthening of trials is not leading to any closer approximation to ideal justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Essentially and in simple terms, the cause of action stated is that retained counsel refused to use the trial tactics insisted upon by the client, for which refusal retained counsel’s services were terminated . 546 S.W.2d at 812 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]n all negligence cases, whether they be automobile related or medical or legal malpractice related, before a recovery can be had, the nexus between the negligence and the injury must be shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.