Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

546 S.W.3d 612

Dobbs v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 2018

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2018-03-06

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2019

3 state decisions

Relies on State of Missouri v. Amanda N. Bazell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2018-03-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1Frankie Dobbs ("Dobbs") appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion seeking post-conviction relief. Dobbs pleaded guilty to a class C felony, pursuant to Section 570.030.3, for stealing a motor vehicle. On appeal, Dobbs argues that, pursuant to State v. Bazell, 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), his sentence should have been based on a class A misdemeanor, not a class C felony. Because Bazell does not apply retroactively to Dobbs's plea and sentencing, we affirm the motion court's judgment.

¶2We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/546/sw3d/612 · .json · Public domain