Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 546 U.S. 189 - Evans v. Chavis

Evans v. Chavis’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

372
cited by 372 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

129 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 372 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024 · most notably Harrington v. Richter (2011), Harrington v. Richter (2011)

129 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

2170200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Michigan v. Long · Harris v. Reed · Ylst v. Nunnemaker · Carey Warden v. Saffold · 5 Cal. 4th 750 - In Re Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 372 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nor do we see how an unexplained delay of this magnitude [ (six months) ] could fall within the scope of the federal statutory word “pending” as interpreted in Saffold.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The decision that a petition has been untimely filed need not be explicitly stated; citation to a case in which a petition was dismissed as untimely filed certainly would suffice.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “must ... examine the delay ... and determine what the state courts would have held in respect to timeliness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.