McVey v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 327 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1452 · 28 U.S.C. § 158 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co · Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]ourts that have interpreted Things Remembered as precluding district courts from reviewing bankruptcy court remand orders also overlook the fact that their interpretation impermissibly deprives Article III district courts of the right to oversee Article I bankruptcy courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]f at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.