Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 547 F.2d 278 - Perel v. Vanderford

Perel v. Vanderford’s Empirical Analysis

547 F.2d 278 · 1977

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
October 1988
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Pierson v. Ray · Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba · United States v. Guadalupe-Garza · Huff v. N. D. Cass Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there may be substantive differences between the ‘real suspicion’ standard and the ‘reasonable suspicion’ standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.