The Lubrizol Corporation v. Russell E. Train, Administrator, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Empirical Analysis
547 F.2d 310 · 1976
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1985), Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1990)
15 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc v. B Camp Barlow · Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Ethyl Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Ppg Industries, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Nalco Chemical Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, National Petroleum Refiners Association v. Environmental Protection Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“on the basis of information obtained under subsection (b) of this section . . . by regulation, (to) control, or prohibit the manufacture . . . of any (environmentally dangerous) fuel or fuel additive for use in a motor vehicle . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an important step in (Section 211's) national program to regulate (the sale of) fuel and fuel additives.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“insur(ing) full access to the technical information needed to evaluate the possible health hazard”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.