Richard J. Getty v. Scott Reed, John W. Collis v. Scott Reed’s Empirical Analysis
547 F.2d 971 · 1977
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 1992 · most notably New Jersey Education Ass'n v. Burke (1978), United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co. (1982)
23 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NM · Ex parte Poresky · Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. Patterson · Romano v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“missed the signs on a well marked trial,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“id. at 202, as opposed to an action based upon deprivation of federal constitutional rights. Although appellant sought to overturn the disbarment as a remedy for constitutional violations, his challenge is not primarily aimed at the merits of the state proceedings but rather at alleged federal constitutional infirmities in the state proceedings. As noted above, we have subject matter jurisdiction over the federal constitutional questions If what we have said thus far suggests that the District Judge who held he had”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“without reference ... to such defenses as res judicata and collateral estoppel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Castorr v. Brundage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.