Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 547 F.3d 707 - Viilo v. Eyre

Viilo v. Eyre’s Empirical Analysis

547 F.3d 707 · 2008

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Maldonado v. Fontanes (2009), Robinson v. Pezzat (2016)

12 federal appellate · 3 district ·

270200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “counsel[s] that the use of deadly force against a household pet is reasonable only if the pet poses an immediate danger and the use of force is unavoidable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Every circuit that has considered the issue has held that the killing of a companion dog constitutes a 'seizure' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.