Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 547 NE2D 1073 - Light v. State

Light v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
4
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Bivins v. State (1995), State v. Rogers (2009)

56 state decisions

3901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Malloy v. Hogan · Oregon v. Elstad · North Carolina v. Butler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court further instructs you that you should not indulge in purely speculative doubts, and the bare possibility that the defendant may be innocent does not raise a reasonable doubt. The question of defendant's guilt must be determined by each of you in view of your obligation to act honestly and fairly in weighing the evidence and reaching a decision which your oath imposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] review of voluntariness of statements made during a custodial interrogation involves looking at all the evidence. Among the considerations are the defendant's low level of intelligence, inconsisten-cles in the defendant's statement, explicit or implicit promises by police interrogators, and the coercive nature of the interrogation atmosphere.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Otherwise inadmissible hearsay is admissible when the testimony is not offered for the truth of the matter asserted therein, but to show the declarant's state of mind when it is in issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.