Frias v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2015
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Robertson v. State · Steffler v. State · Survance v. State · Brewster v. State · UnitedStates v. Holt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an intelligent and deliberate agreement between the parties”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"(a) A person conspires to commit a felony when, with intent to commit the felony, he agrees with another person to commit the felony.... (b) The state must allege and prove that either the person or the person with whom he agreed performed an overt act in furtherance of the agreement."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sharp v. State“instruction could be understood to say that the jury could find there was an agreement even though the evidence showed they never came together and never entered into an express agreement,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.