Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 547 NW2D 366 - Ubel v. State

Ubel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2012

1 district · 3 state decisions

40199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396B (§ 1903 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Welch v. Henry · Nichols v. Coolidge · Blodgett v. Holden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No law shall be construed to be retroactive unless clearly and manifestly so intended by the legislature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.