Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2010
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hahn v. Citizens State Bank · Gardner v. Walker · Pritchard v. State, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Department of Health & Social Services · Big Horn Coal Company v. SHERIDAN-WYO. COAL COMPANY · Spencer v. Pringle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““NOTICE OF APPEAL “NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-named plaintiffs hereby appeal to the Supreme Court of the State of Wyoming from the Order Denying Motion for New Trial signed by Judge Maier on September 19,1975, and entered in the office of the Clerk of the District Court of Platte County on September 23, 1975. “Dated October 17th, 1975.” [Emphasis supplied]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"We said in Culbertson v. Ainsworth, 26 Wyo. 214 , at pages 215 and 216, 181 P. 418 at page 418 [(1919)], and Hahn, supra [ Hahn v. Citizens' State Bank, 25 Wyo. 467 , 171 P. 889 , reh. denied 172 P. 705 (1918)]: "`... [A] notice of appeal served and filed before the judgment appealed from was entered was premature and ineffective to bring the case here for review . ..'" 547 P.2d at 1206 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An appeal permitted by law from a district court to the supreme court shall be taken by filing a notice of appeal with the district court within thirty days from the entry of the judgment or final order appealed from and serving the same in accordance with the provisions of Rule 5 * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.