Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 547 P2D 391 - Ellington v. Crisp

Ellington v. Crisp’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Austin v. Director of Patuxent Institution · Horn v. Haugh · Carstens v. Rans · 9 Or. App. 508 - Lerch v. Cupp · Harrell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All grounds for relief available to an applicant under this act must be raised in his original, supplemental or amended application. Any ground finally adjudicated or not so raised, or knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived in the proceeding that resulted in the conviction or sentence or in any other proceeding the applicant has taken to secure relief may not be the basis for a subse quent application, unless the court finds a ground for relief which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the prior application.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The procedure for the filing of an appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeals shall be as provided in the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals; and the Court of Criminal Appeals shall provide by court rules, which will have the force of statute, and be in furtherance of this method of appeal: (1) [procedure dictating preparation of record]; (2) the procedure to be followed for the completion and submission of the appeal taken hereunder; and (3) the procedure to be followed for filing a petition for and the issuance of a writ of certiorari. [2]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “... Excluding a timely appeal, this act encompasses and replaces all common law and statutory methods of challenging a conviction or sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.