Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

547 So. 2d 313

547 So.2d 313

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1883

Glaze v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-08-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1993

2 state decisions

Relies on 545 So. 2d 838 - Lambert v. State · 470 So. 2d 75 - Higgs v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-08-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the order of revocation of probation except as to Counts II-IV. Since the findings of violations contained in Counts II-IV lack an evidentiary basis, the cause is remanded with instructions to modify the order by striking those counts. See Higgs v. State, 470 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Additionally, appellant’s sentence is reversed and remanded to the trial court with instructions to resentenee appellant in accordance with his presumptive guidelines range, or in accordance with the one-cell “bump-up” authorized by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14). See Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989).

¶2AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

LETTS, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
/547/so2d/313 · .json · Public domain