Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith

547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

195
cited by 195 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 191 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 195 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably 658 So. 2d 55 - State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laforet (1995), 722 So. 2d 177 - Donaldson v. State (1998)

1 federal appellate · 191 state decisions

12001989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Russello v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 195 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “offenses are separate if each offense requires proof of an element that the other does not, without regard to the accusatory pleading or the proof adduced at trial.”
    45 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. McCray · Brown v. State
  2. “[T]he Double Jeopardy Clause does no more than prevent the sentencing court from prescribing greater punishment than the legislature intended.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Gayman v. State · 678 So. 2d 319 - Boler v. State
  3. “With respect to cumulative sentences in a single trial, the dispositive question is whether the legislature intended separate convictions and sentences for the two crimes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 761 So. 2d 1135 - Brown v. State · 662 So. 2d 1016 - Crawford v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.