547 So. 2d 657 - Stone v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2017
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tibbs v. Florida · Tamotsu Tanaka v. Creditors' Committee 1 · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · Heiney v. Florida · 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]efense counsel did not object to the sufficiency of the trial court's findings. Except in cases of fundamental error, this court will not consider an issue unless it was specifically raised as the legal basis for the objection in the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Elwell v. State“The defendant's tongue is encompassed by the word `oral' in the statute, and oral union with the sexual organ of another (the victim's vagina in this case) is expressly proscribed by the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pate“time, content, and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient safeguards of reliability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.