547 So. 2d 985 - Schorb v. Schorb’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 466 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on 472 So. 2d 1145 - Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe · Hand v. State · Hagen v. Viney · Bronk v. State · 103 So. 2d 202 - Goldstein v. Acme Concrete Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Upon the entry of an order establishing, enforcing, or modifying an alimony or a child support obligation, the court shall enter a separate order for income deduction if one has not been entered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When either party is about to remove himself or herself or his or her property out of the state, or fraudulently convey or conceal it, the court may award a ne exeat or injunction against the party or the property and make such orders as will secure alimony or support to the party who should receive it. (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Siravo v. Siravo“[u]pon initial examination, the statute authorizing income deductions would appear to apply to alimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.