State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2002
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Phillip L. Rogers, United States of America v. Charles Spotts · United States of America Ex Rel. Stanley Meadows v. State of New York and Warden of the United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia · United States v. Heck · State v. Richardson · State v. Dougherty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state cannot split a single crime and prosecute it in parts. However, several distinct offenses may be committed in the course of the same general transaction. The fact that two crimes occur at substantially the same time or that substantially the same evidence must be shown to prove both crimes does not require the state to present only one charge. (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Childs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.