Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 547 SW2D 567 - Goldfarb v. Baker

Goldfarb v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2019

7 state decisions

5019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 38 Cal. 2d 330 - State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. Siliznoff · Medlin v. Allied Investment Company · Johnson v. Woman's Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “d. Extreme and outrageous conduct. The cases thus far decided have found liability only where the defendant’s conduct has been extreme and outrageous. It has not been enough that the defendant has acted with an intent which is tortious or even criminal, or that he has intended to inflict emotional distress, or even that his conduct has been characterized by “malice,” or a degree of aggravation which would entitle the plaintiff to punitive damages for another tort. Liability has been found only where the conduct has been so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. Generally, the case is one in which the recitation of the facts to an average member of the community would arouse his resentment against the actor, and lead him to exclaim, “Outrageous!””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the conduct of the defendants has been so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to be beyond the pale of deceney, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized society, and (2) the conduct results in serious mental injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.