Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 547 SW2D 590 - Reynolds v. State

Reynolds v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently March 1992 · most notably Ex Parte Cannon (1976), Thomas v. State (1988)

60 state decisions

300197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Plant Food Corporation v. State · Ex Parte Cannon · Baldwin v. State · Gonzales v. State · Moore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a person (2) with intent to deprive the owner of property (3) exercises control over the property, other than real property (4) which is stolen property (5) obtained by another (6) knowing it was stolen.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) A person commits an offense if he unlawfully appropriates property with intent to deprive the owner of property. (b) Appropriation of property is unlawful if: (1) it is without the owner’s effective consent; or (2) the property is stolen and the actor appropriates the property knowing it was stolen by another.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to deprive the owner of property: (1) he obtains the property unlawfully; or (2) he exercises control over the property, other than real property, unlawfully- (b) Obtaining or exercising control over property is unlawful if: (1) the actor obtains or exercises control over the property without the owner’s effective consent; or (2) the property is stolen and the actor obtains it from another or exercises control over the property obtained by another knowing it was stolen.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.