Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 547 SW3D 585 - Juan v. Growe

Juan v. Growe’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. O'Blennis v. Adolf · Azzone v. United States · Edwards v. State · Watters v. Travel Guard International · State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Dierker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We review the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and afford that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although the demand need not be in a certain form, it must be definite on amount and time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.