Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 F.2d 13 - Lombardo v. Meachum

Lombardo v. Meachum’s Empirical Analysis

548 F.2d 13 · 1977

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1997 · most notably Olim v. Wakinekona (1983), Shango v. Jurich (1982)

35 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions

320197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Wolff v. McDonnell · Perry v. Sindermann · Bell v. Hood · Bishop v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The regulations plaintiff relies upon *** simply provide that an inmate will receive a certain type of a hearing before he is reclassified. The regulations contain no standards governing the Commissioner’s exercise of his discretion, and they, therefore, cannot create the kind of substantive interest which is required before a state created “liberty” interest can be said to exist.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Plaintiff, here, has no federal due process protection because, as our earlier discussion establishes, any violation of state prison regulations did not result in a deprivation of ‘liberty’ within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Id. at 16, n. 4 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The superintendents of the institutions, under the supervision of the Department of Correction, shall treat the prisoners with the kindness which their obedience, industry and good conduct merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.