Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 548 F.2d 281 - Neu v. Grant

Neu v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

548 F.2d 281 · 1977

Citation profile

132
cited by 132 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

95 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. (1981), Channel v. Heckler (1984)

95 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

71019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Edelman v. Jordan · Hicks v. Miranda · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Matters not appearing in the record will not be considered by the court of appeals.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The need for specific objection applies to ... instructing the jury....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is sufficient that a party, at the time of the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which he desires the court to take or his objection to the action of the court and his grounds therefor; and, if a party has no opportunity to object to a ruling or order at the time it is made, the absence of an objection does not thereafter prejudice him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.