Blondo v. Bailar’s Empirical Analysis
548 F.2d 301 · 1977
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2015
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 39 U.S.C. § 1001 · 39 U.S.C. § 101 (Air Carriage of International Mail Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 3321 · 5 U.S.C. § 4301 · 5 U.S.C. § 4304 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 7501 (Civil Service Due Process Amendments)
Relies on Chandler v. Roudebush · Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp. · Salone v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have not considered the demand of appellant for the award of attorney's fees since it does not appear that this was ever raised in the trial court, and accordingly, it is not appropriate for this court to consider the problem.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is not appropriate to impose limits on discovery,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.