Milhouse v. Levi’s Empirical Analysis
548 F.2d 357 · 1976
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 11 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Geraghty v. United States Parole Commission (1978), National Treasury Employees Union v. Reagan (1981)
28 federal appellate · 11 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4082
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Stone v. Powell · Hagans v. Lavine · Hormel v. Helvering · Jenkins v. McKeithen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“integral part of the sentencing procedure.” Id. The Milhouse court concluded that the latter regulations were not an element of punishment attached to an inmate’s initial conviction, and therefore were not subject to the constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws. As addressed infra, the Supreme Court subsequently rejected this distinction in Lynce and Weaver . Moreover, anyone who has experienced, or even personally observed, the conditions of a prison, as compared to those in a halfway house, could not reasonably contend that there is no difference in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] furlough program, unlike parole, * * * is an internal rehabilitational program the denial of which cannot be said to be an element of the punishment attached to an inmate's initial conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[V]iolation of the criminal provisions of the District of Columbia Code are considered offenses against the laws of the United States notwithstanding the local nature of the court system”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.